I had a really great day today. I feel really great about the path my life is on. Thinking back to myself a year ago, it's surprising that today I'm happy about my decision to pursue a Ph.D.
I have two stimulants for these thoughts. One was a surprise. An article reposted by a friend: "Are we giving away too many Ph.D's?" The answer in the case of this article, which deals with the dearth of science Ph.D.'s with nowhere to work, is no. We simply don't value knowledge. I'm not prepared to defend the cult of the expert -- to place myself on a pedestal and beg all you non-soon-to-be-doctors to bow down to my great wealth of brain wrinkles. No, but we do need to value resourcefulness, passion for knowledge, and a zeal for critical thinking, especially when they are paired with humility and compassion. Not everyone with a Ph.D. is worth employing, no (I see those who are so far removed from "the real world" all too often); however, the life track exists for a noble reason. It's base reason for existence is one worth supporting.
My other stimulant for thinking about all this is more persistent. On Friday, I'll receive my questions for my qualifying exams: a formality through which my committee of advisors will certify me as sufficiently expert in the fields of "marriage and the politics of sexuality" and "media and resistance in the information age." I've been busily reading (sometimes skimming) through the lists I've deemed worthwhile to my studies.
My blog is a silly thing. When I'm writing in it actively, I live for the self-discipline of writing for myself and a small audience of friends and strangers who happen upon an entry through a relevant search. There's a thrill in knowing that my inner thoughts (I try to be as frank as I can...how very livejournal of me) may be slightly useful to others, but I don't have the energy for the hubris to think I should try to cull a large audience. My inner thoughts are too lame for most.
I realized today that I stopped writing on my blog partially because I was devoting too much of my time to "gathering my thoughts." I have avoided getting in touch with people who have a great wealth of knowledge on my dissertation topic because I fear my own thoughts on the matter are not "solidified" enough. "Gathering my thoughts" has suffered by not daring to make bold claims on subjects that interest me and airing them in public. It's why I have my blog. I want people to disagree with me. Along with reading, interacting with and reacting to those who disagree with me is the only way I'll think better.
And so I've resolved to write more, here and elsewhere. It's part of the process of gathering my thoughts. I nearly lost myself in the trap of thinking that simply following the infrastructural tracks of the Ph.D. would inherently make me a more critical thinker and better citizen. That was wrong. I need to (gather and) air my thoughts.
As I prepare to embark on my qualifying exams, feel free to browse the reading list I've subjected myself to, with the help of my advisors:
I have two stimulants for these thoughts. One was a surprise. An article reposted by a friend: "Are we giving away too many Ph.D's?" The answer in the case of this article, which deals with the dearth of science Ph.D.'s with nowhere to work, is no. We simply don't value knowledge. I'm not prepared to defend the cult of the expert -- to place myself on a pedestal and beg all you non-soon-to-be-doctors to bow down to my great wealth of brain wrinkles. No, but we do need to value resourcefulness, passion for knowledge, and a zeal for critical thinking, especially when they are paired with humility and compassion. Not everyone with a Ph.D. is worth employing, no (I see those who are so far removed from "the real world" all too often); however, the life track exists for a noble reason. It's base reason for existence is one worth supporting.
My other stimulant for thinking about all this is more persistent. On Friday, I'll receive my questions for my qualifying exams: a formality through which my committee of advisors will certify me as sufficiently expert in the fields of "marriage and the politics of sexuality" and "media and resistance in the information age." I've been busily reading (sometimes skimming) through the lists I've deemed worthwhile to my studies.
My blog is a silly thing. When I'm writing in it actively, I live for the self-discipline of writing for myself and a small audience of friends and strangers who happen upon an entry through a relevant search. There's a thrill in knowing that my inner thoughts (I try to be as frank as I can...how very livejournal of me) may be slightly useful to others, but I don't have the energy for the hubris to think I should try to cull a large audience. My inner thoughts are too lame for most.
I realized today that I stopped writing on my blog partially because I was devoting too much of my time to "gathering my thoughts." I have avoided getting in touch with people who have a great wealth of knowledge on my dissertation topic because I fear my own thoughts on the matter are not "solidified" enough. "Gathering my thoughts" has suffered by not daring to make bold claims on subjects that interest me and airing them in public. It's why I have my blog. I want people to disagree with me. Along with reading, interacting with and reacting to those who disagree with me is the only way I'll think better.
And so I've resolved to write more, here and elsewhere. It's part of the process of gathering my thoughts. I nearly lost myself in the trap of thinking that simply following the infrastructural tracks of the Ph.D. would inherently make me a more critical thinker and better citizen. That was wrong. I need to (gather and) air my thoughts.
As I prepare to embark on my qualifying exams, feel free to browse the reading list I've subjected myself to, with the help of my advisors:
Major List: Marriage and the Politics of Sexuality
Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex
Lauren Berlant, The Queen of America Goes to Washington City
Leo Bersani, Homos
Leo Bersani & Adam Phillips, Intimacies
bell hooks, “Feminism: A Transformational Politic”
Bikini Kill, “Riot Grrrl Philosophy”
Sasha Cagen, quirkyalone
Pat Califia, Public Sex
Ryan Conrad, ed., Against Equality
Stephanie Coontz, Marriage, a History
Nancy Cott, Public Vows
Angela Y. Davis, “Outcast Mothers and Surrogates: Racism and Reproductive Politics in the Nineties”
Samuel Delaney, Times Square Red, Times Square Blue
David Eng, The Feeling of Kinship (Intro & Chapter 1)
John D’Emilio & Estelle B. Freedman, Intimate Matters
John D’Emilio, “Capitalism & Gay Identity”
Lisa Duggan & Nan Hunter (Editors), Sex Wars
Lisa Duggan, Twilight of Equality
Dossie Easton & Catherine A. Liszt, The Ethical Slut
Friedrich Engels, Origins of Family, Private Property, and the State
Lee Edelman, “Tearooms and Sympathy”
Susan Faludi, Backlash
Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality Vol. 1
Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality, Vol. 2
Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality, Vol. 3
Betty Freidan, The Feminine Mystique
Jaclyn Geller, Here Comes the Bride: Women, Weddings, and the Marriage Mystique
Anthony Giddens, The Transformation of Intimacy
Ian Hacking, “Making Up People”
Eleanor Leacock, Myth of Male Dominance
Judith Levine, Harmful to Minors
Audre Lorde, “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House”
David M. Halperin, “Is there a History of Sexuality?”
Laura Kipnis, Against Love
Saba Mahmood, The Politics of Piety
Angela McRobbie, “Postfeminism and Popular Culture: Bridget Jones and the New Gender Regime”
John Stuart Mill, The Subjection of Women
Chandra Talpade Mohanty, “Cartographies of Struggle: Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism”
Richard Mohr, “The Outing Controversy”
Donald Morton (editor), The Material Queer
Jasbir Puar, “Mapping US Homonormativities”
Adrienne Rich, “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence”
Gayle S. Rubin, “Thinking Sex”
Eve Sedgwick, The Epistemology of the Closet
Ruth Vanita, Love’s Rites
Michael Warner, The Trouble with Normal
Virginia Wright Wexman, Creating the Couple: Love, Marriage, and Hollywood Performance
Supplemental readings in gender/sexuality studies:
Gloria Anzaldua, Borderlands/La Frontera
Leo Bersani, Is the Rectum a Grave?
M. Gigi Durham, The Lolita Effect
Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women
Lee Edelman, No Future
Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics
Gayatri Gopinath, Impossible Desires
Roger Hallas, Reframing Bodies
Guy Hocquenghem, The Screwball Asses
Kamala Kampadoo, Global Sex Workers
Audre Lorde, “The Uses of the Erotic: The Erotic as Power”
Catherine MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State
Chandra Talpade Mohanty, “ ‘Under Western Eyes’ Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggle”
Chandra Talpade Mohanty, “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses”
Cherrie Moraga, The Last Generation
Jose Munoz, Cruising Utopia
Jasbir Puar, Terrorist Assemblages
Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics
Minor List: Media and Resistance in the Information Age
Arjun Appudurai, Modernity at Large
Chris Atton, An Alternative Internet
Nancy Baym, Personal Communication in Digital Media
Yochai Benkler, The Wealth of Networks
Lance Bennett, “Communicating Global Activism”
Wiebe Bijker, Thomas Hughes, & Trevor Pinch, The Social Construction of Technology
Bruce Bimber, Information and American Democracy (Chapter 1)
Jay David Bolter & Richard Grusin, Remediation
Bertolt Brecht, “The Radio as an Apparatus of Communication”
Manuel Castells, Communication Power
Andy Chadwick, “The Political Information Cycle in a Hybrid News System”
Gabriella Coleman, “Code is Speech”
John Downing, “The Independent Media Center Movement and the Anarchist Socialist Tradition”
Christina Dunbar-Hester, “Geeks, Meta-Geeks, and Gender Trouble”
Christina Dunbar-Hester, “Beyond ‘Dudecore’?”
Steven Duncombe, Notes from Underground
Ron Eglash & J. Bleecker, “The Race for Cyberspace”
Ron Eglash, J. Croissant, G. Di Chiro, & R. Fouche, Appropriating Technology
Rayvon Fouche, Say It Loud, I’m Black and I’m Proud”
Thomas Frank, The Conquest of Cool
Alexander Galloway & Eugene Thacker, The Exploit
Mark Hansen, Bodies in Code
Donna Haraway, “A Cyborg Manifesto”
Christine Harold, Ourspace
Pekka Himanen, The Hacker Ethic
Philip Howard, Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy
Kevin Howley, Community Media
Frederic Jameson, Intro & Chapter 1 of Postmodernism
Henry Jenkins, Convergence Culture
Henry Jenkins, Fans, Bloggers, & Gamers
Steven Johnson, Interface Culture
David Karpf, “Looking Beyond Clicktivism”
Mary Celeste Kearney, Girls Make Media
Andrew Keen, The Cult of the Amateur
Christopher Kelty, Two Bits
Naomi Klein, No Logo
Daniel Kreiss, “Open Source as Practice and Ideology”
Calle Lasn, Culture Jam
Lawrence Lessig, Code V. 2.0
Lev Manovich, The Language of New Media
Carolyn Marvin, When Old Technologies Were Knew
Evgeny Morozov, The Net Delusion
Lisa Nakamura, Digitizing Race
Nicholas Negroponte, Being Digital
Lisa Parks, Cultures in Orbit
Eric Raymond, The Cathedral and the Bazaar
Howard Rheingold, Smart Mobs
Alison Piepmeier, Girl Zines: Making Media, Doing Feminism
Stephen Shiels & Robert Ogles, “Black Liberation Radio”
Clay Shirky, Cognitive Surplus
Clay Shirky, Here Comes Everybody
Aram Sinnreich, Mashed Up
Susan Leigh Star, “Power, Technology, and the Phenomenology of Conventions”
Lucy Suchman, “Located Accountabilities in Technology Production”
Douglas Thomas, Hacker Culture
Sherry Turkle, Life on the Screen
Fred Turner, From Counterculture to Cyberculture
Judy Wacjman, “From Women and Technology to Gendered Technoscience”
Mackenzie Wark, Hacker Manifesto
Langdon Winner, “Do Artifacts Have Politics?”
Sally Wyatt, “Non-Users also Matter”
Jonathan Zittrain, The Future of the Internet…And How to Stop It
Supplemental Reading (Other media technology or media & resistance readings)
Theodor Adorno & Max Horkheimer, “The Culture Industry”
Theodor Adorno, “The Culture Industry Reconsidered”
Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities
Bela Belazs, “The Close-Up”
Walter Benjamin, “Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”
Michael F. Brown, “Who Owns Native Culture?”
James Carey, “Technology and Ideology: The Case of the Telegraph”
Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life
John Dewey, Art as Experience
John Dewey, The Public and Its Problems
Susan Douglas, “Popular Culture and Populist Technology”
John Downing, Radical Media
Claude Fischer, America Calling
Mary Gray, “Negotiating Identities/Queering Desires”
Dorothy Kidd, “Indymedia.org”
Ronald Kline, “Resisting Consumer Technology in Rural America”
Ronald Kline and Trevor Pinch, “Users as Agents of Technological Change”
Holly Kruse, Site and Sound
Martha McCaughey & Michael Ayers, Cyberactivism
Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media: The Extensions of man
Nelly Oudshoorn, Els Rommes & Marcelle Strienstra, “Configuring the User as Everybody”
Nelly Oudshoorn and Trevor Pinch, How Users Matter
Lynn Spiegel, Make Room for TV
Susan Leigh Star & Bowker, Sorting Things Out
Judy Wajcman, TechnoFeminism
Jesse Walker, Rebels on the Air
Raymond Williams, Television
Sally Wyatt, “Challenging the Digital Imperative”
4 comments:
I love your lists! It was interesting to see what made the main list and what made the supplemental - I think that's a good strategy for quals preparation.
And I'm glad you're happy getting your PhD, you're supposed to be doing this, I promise.
Hello, fellow LAMB. Just wanted to let you know that The LAMMYs are coming up and we are hoping for the best voter turnout for the nominations ever. Every LAMB #1-900 is eligible to vote (and to win!), and that includes you. To participate, please go to this site: http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/521956
Thanks!
Very nice, thanks for the information.
sewa mobil
Thank you for an excellent weblog !! I discovered some useful information and will suggest your blog for all my buddies.
parfum | jakarta hotel | rumah dijual | perlengkapan bayi | properti semarang | mesin fotocopy | party organizer | rental forklift
Post a Comment