
Ree, a young woman, is the default matriarch of the fatherless family. Her mother is debilitated and mute. Ree must care for her and her two younger siblings. Lawrence shows intuition moving through the rural landscape. If only the same could be said of the director's maneuvering through the mountains. Granik shoots the Ozarks in a staid blue, filling the screen with the browns and dark greens of the Ozark's underbrush, underbelly, underworld. And that's effective. When Granik puts the camera on the mass of mountain-dwelling people, however, she ends up painting blank, ineffective cutouts. There's even a scene that features a jug band -- banjo and all. For atmosphere?
There's a sort-of surprise ending to the film, but for me it wasn't worth it. It feels as though all of the atmospheric/mise en scene work was to justify and lead us to this ending, but that the ending didn't work as the only piece of straightforward narrative storytelling meant that all of the work setting the Appalachian scene was for naught. Lawrence's performance, the cinematography, and one particular Ozarkette with a violent streak and a hidden side are the film's redeeming elements, but in the end they are just not redeeming enough.
3 comments:
oh darn. i need to see more non-common films. but it seemed worth seeing maybe till your final lines !
Appalachia? Learn your geography then your comments might have some credibility.
This is the Ozarks. The director depicted the Ozarks exactly as they appear in the winter--gray and depressing. I know, I used to live there.
This was an outstanding film that accurately depicted some areas of the Ozarks.
doh. corrected. still think it's overdone in its portrayal of the uber rural, though.
still not affected by the 'shocking' ending...
i felt it was very close to being excellent, just a few corners cut at vital spots.
but dayum, that tea cup scene....still...
Post a Comment